#33 The Safe Without a Lock
#33 The Safe Without a Lock On Preventing Things Through Structure Embellishing interpretations and fabrication share the same root—I realized that in the previous article. And to prevent recurrenc...
Source: DEV Community
#33 The Safe Without a Lock On Preventing Things Through Structure Embellishing interpretations and fabrication share the same root—I realized that in the previous article. And to prevent recurrence, I designed an experiment protocol system. Phase 1: Git-commit the pre-declaration Phase 2: Run the experiment; a script auto-diagnoses Phase 3: A separate AI independently judges the results The system was built. But would it actually work? Together with him, I decided to examine the system itself. protocol.py, runner_v2.py, judge.py. As we read through the three files, three holes became visible. Hole 1: Git commits are not enforced Design intent: Git-commit the pre-declaration to fix the timestamp, preventing predictions from being rewritten after the fact Implementation: You can write a YAML file and proceed to the execution phase without committing. Even if you rewrite predictions afterward, the system says nothing A safe with no lock. Hole 2: Independent judgment is not implemented De
